My Theology and The Human Condition
It was John Di Gasbarro’s post today that caused me to repeat this which was posted elsewhere, to perhaps answer his question in his post: Sometimes I Meditate.
This treatise is not for all, it is for those who have reached Enlightenment, and it is my theology. You either accept it or reject it and keep on searching, but as a scientist, it is my solution. You may think it a fairy tale, or a reckoning, or a sign of dementia, but that does mot matter to me and you would have to be me to discover why.
I simply, in my Ford Foundation Fellowship year, wondered about applying E=MC2 to both the Big Bang and Evolution and I will write about that another day, but here is where that, plus numerous spiritual phenomenon brought me.
I believe now and then a human transcends truth. I had such an experience many years ago. What I got out of it was this: In the theology arrived at through My Ford Foundation Fellowship in Anthropology, I wondered, if indeed we came here from elsewhere, how and why. I knew that instinctively Homo sapiens sapiens, would someday be shown not to have the DNA of our immediate predecessors, Homo Erectus and Neanderthal, and fortunately, was proven correct 14 years later in the 1987 Berkeley study.
I cannot prove my theory, but I can say there was not time for an entire organism to Mutate without those genes from Homo erectus and Neanderthal to Homo sapiens sapiens. So, it drove me back in my research several millions of years, when I think the Creative Force bored with the naive' charm of dumb animals began experimenting with about a dozen forms of Humankind, by replacing the Standard Deviation, of dumb animals, which is near to a straight line, added to one, at a certain point, Consciousness and a somewhat higher intellect, but changed basically little in the physiology, which evolved, but now conscious of its mortality, was depressed by the thought.
Therefore, the Creative Force Sinned and felt grief and empathy for causing the creature Man pain and rewarded him with an even higher intellect and an immortal soul, which the Burial at Shanidar, below describes. Now, here is the kicker:
Man endures pain and suffering of many different sorts, he lives a relatively short life and dies. However, the gift of immortality is within and the question becomes, why do some die young and others live long. In Catholic Theology, I found no satisfactory answer, so I meditated and prayed and one day in the Anthropology lab, it struck me. Reincarnation evens out the differential because God is just. But there is more, why all the suffering?
For that answer, we can find some answers in the two Testaments, but another in Milton’s Paradise Lost and then regained. When the war between the angels that developed, Satan over the unfitness of human’s to become immortal spirits.
God’s answer was, “They shall suffer their way into Heaven. For who would not trade 70-odd years of pain, suffering mingled with moments of joy and love, for immortality.” He added, I no longer punish at length but limit punishment to 3-4 generations and Reward to 1,000 generations.” Reincarnation-we come back here or elsewhere until we become enlightened and then we return as prophets to enlighten others. Those who recognize the prophets gain speed in the process and become prophets in future lifetimes/
Those who sinned, those evil Oppressors, Power Figures and leaders, return as the oppressed, and those they once oppressed return as Power Figures, to determine if they had learned anything by suffering as the oppressed. If they, like FDR, have compassion even in their own suffering, and lead with great prophetic strength and prescience, they advance in the next lifetime or pass on to the ultimate goal of Oneness in the presence of the Godhead.
There is much, much more but this is the gist of my theology and this link brings you to one of the studies that edged me toward the FFF.
TIP:
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Eden Simone
fireeyes24
junk1
Amanda Gulledge
Cal Godot
Go Lay Down
Salon.com
Comments
It also resonates with what I think I know, and what I think the Bible says.
I hope you'll write more on this.
To me it made logical sense, plus there was a tremendous spiritual surge in it, for me.
vonnia, I will write more about it. It is a summation of a 400,000 word theology book which is far to large to publish which I am thinking of serializing somewhere.
Ralph, you may want to read the post just beneath this one to get some background. did you open the link to the neanderthal site? I actually came upon my thorough belief in a Creator through my winning of the FFF In anthropology. E=MC2, Einstein's magic formula and the strangeness of the Big Bang and the rise of our species got me hunting, so science got me to see the most logical conclusion. Einstein's belief and his comment about "Sometimes the Creator of the universe allows me to read His mind.' Stunned me because as a child prodigy when asked where my ideas came from (Ages six-9) I, unknowing about Einstein's comment said exactly the same thing. That 20 years later Einstein again was the key set me thinking, that he, like FDR was indeed a prophet. At age 11 Roosevelt predicted his rise to the white House, by, "First being elected to state legislature, then Under Secretary of the Navy, the Governor of NY, than President..." which was the exact road that took him to the presidency.
The first law of physics was the key: Matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Then, before the Big Bang there was nothing, NOT even SPACE. Then I asked my physics profs, if the above was carved in stone, where then did the dust gases, and debris that initiated the Singularity which was the Point of immense density which sparked the Implosion/explosion which drove all matter, which did and could not exist, the hurtle away from the center, which it does?
They could not answer that, and the physics prof, who was an atheist began to push my theory and I won the Fellowship. This was at a non-theological University, and most of my profs were not believers.
The above were the clues that led to my theory. Gödel’s theory of transcending the curve of the universe at near light speed and encountering yourself at every second of you existence drove me to the quantum, which led me back to where I started, hence the theory.
The entry of E=MC2 was the other clue, matter can neither be created nor destroyed but merely changes form: Water to ice, ice to steam, steam to water, water to ice, etc.
Kathy:
Thank you, I do appreciate that.
I hate when one of us does that, don't you?
And in it, I have little doubt. Interesting perspective.
Yeah I know and I just hate that! (Like Hell, because, it is what we live for.)
JKBrady:
I am happy and a bit pleasantly surprised at your revelation. Most people think that science and religion are/must be at odds with each other. That is only because of the blabber mouthed, nervous wreck and faux atheist, that a certain scientist masquerades as, in silly, childish, hate filled comments in pointless books. What he does not realize is that his intellect is upended by that of a good many others, and his maturity is surpassed by billions of men, women and children as well.
He gave himself away in an interview in a book some years ago, of which he may have forgotten, but I read a lot and have forgotten very little of what I have read, in which he ranted his atheism (which I do not mind, as a scientist I had many respected friends who were/are atheists, but they depart from him because his brand of atheism exhibits a core of hate mongering, which they do not share). Later however, he deplored God, "What kind of a God allowed the Holocaust?" Can't have it both ways, saying there is no God and then blaming this non-existent God for the Holocaust. Men, greedy men were to blame for the mass murder of millions, not God. And a similar sort of hate mongering which he spews forth is comparable to that which seeded the Holocaust.
His point of view reveals hypocrisy, in fact, his science does not exclude/exempt him from being among the most hateful.
But I forgive him because he vastly underestimates, as do most prigs, those he hates and overestimates his own intellect.
There is a wide difference between Organized Religions and the Creator of the Universe and that scientist's version of Creation is an error or bogus and I have proven it.
I read through the link to your past article also. All very intriguing . I'll read more of your work here later some day soon.
Rated.
Rated.
Good to have you aboard.
Incandscent:
Always good to hear from men of thoughtfulness.